Comparison
Proc2Proof vs Vanta.
Vanta and Proc2Proof solve adjacent problems with different mechanisms. The decision depends on whether you need a readiness rating to share with prospects, or verifiable evidence that procedures executed.
TL;DR
Vanta is a strong readiness platform for SaaS startups chasing their first SOC 2. Proc2Proof is for organizations that need to prove ongoing procedure execution, including on-premises and regulated workloads, across more than just SOC 2.
| Dimension | Vanta | Proc2Proof |
|---|---|---|
| Output | Compliance score and readiness rating | PASS / FAIL / INCONCLUSIVE per check, plus a case for every fail |
| Evidence | Self-attestation + uploaded screenshots | Live data from connectors; SHA-256 hash on every evidence item |
| Closure | Ticket closes on user attestation | Verified Closure: case closes only when a re-test returns PASS |
| Frameworks | SOC 2 first; ISO and others added later | Multiple frameworks in one engine (ISO, SOC 2, NIST CSF, GDPR, HIPAA, PCI-DSS, CCPA, IL-Privacy) |
| Customer-controlled Runner | Cloud only | Customer-controlled Runner from BUSINESS tier; raw evidence stays in the customer environment |
| Free entry | Demo call required | Free scan via Entra ID OAuth, no installation or agent |
| Best for | SaaS teams chasing their first SOC 2 | Teams needing continuous procedure-execution proof, including on regulated or on-prem workloads |
Where Vanta is the better fit
If you need a SOC 2 audit-ready package fast and the attestation-based model fits, Vanta has more auditor partnerships and a polished dashboard for that specific journey. We're not pretending to replace that. Proc2Proof is for the next step: when 'do you have it' isn't enough and you need to prove 'are you actually doing it'.